↓ Skip to main content

Amplicon mapping and transcriptional analysis pinpoint cyclin L as a candidate oncogene in head and neck cancer.

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Research, November 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Amplicon mapping and transcriptional analysis pinpoint cyclin L as a candidate oncogene in head and neck cancer.
Published in
Cancer Research, November 2002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Redon, Thomas Hussenet, Gaétan Bour, Krishna Caulee, Bernard Jost, Danièle Muller, Joseph Abecassis, Stanislas du Manoir

Abstract

DNA gains targeting the 3q chromosome are common in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, as well as in lung, ovarian, and cervical cancer. Several candidate oncogenes located on 3q were proposed, i.e., PIK3CA, p63, and eIF-5A2. However, none of these genes was found included in a narrow high-level amplification. Recently, microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) was developed for high-resolution screening of deletions and amplifications in tumor genomes. In this study, by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization, we found a narrow 3q25.3 high-level amplification in a head and neck cancer cell line. We precisely delimited the 3-Mb length-amplified segment by semiquantitative PCR and measured the transcriptional level of every gene (RefSeq full-length mRNA) located inside this segment by cDNA microarray and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR. Four genes were overexpressed in three head and neck cancer cell lines with increased DNA copy number, compared with a control tongue cell line. We extended the transcriptional analysis of these four genes to 20 head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Only one gene, cyclin L (ania-6a), is commonly overexpressed in primary tumors compared with corresponding normal tissues. This cyclin was previously pinpointed as a candidate for a role in promoting cell cycle entry. Thus, we propose cyclin L as a candidate oncogene in head and neck cancer.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 36%
Student > Bachelor 5 23%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Mathematics 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#8,312
of 18,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,442
of 52,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#9
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.