↓ Skip to main content

Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on cardiovascular disease, death and safety outcomes in type 2 diabetes – A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on cardiovascular disease, death and safety outcomes in type 2 diabetes – A systematic review
Published in
Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice, March 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.03.027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karin Rådholm, Jason Hy Wu, Muh Geot Wong, Celine Foote, Gregory Fulcher, Kenneth W Mahaffey, Vlado Perkovic, Bruce Neal

Abstract

Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors appear to protect against increased risks of cardiovascular and kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes but also cause some harms. Whether effects are comparable across drug class or specific to individual compounds is unclear. This meta-analysis assessed the class and individual compound effects of SGLT2 inhibition versus control on cardiovascular events, death, kidney disease and safety outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and regulatory databases were systematically searched for data from randomized clinical trials that included reporting of cardiovascular events, deaths or safety outcomes. We used fixed effects models and inverse variance weighting to calculate relative risks with the 95% confidence intervals. The analyses included data from 82 trials, four overviews and six regulatory reports and there were 1,968 major cardiovascular events identified for analysis. Patients randomly assigned to SGLT2 had lower risks of major cardiovascular events (RR 0.85, 95%CI 0.77 to 0.93), heart failure (RR 0.67, 95%CI 0.55 to 0.80), all-cause death (RR 0.79, 95%CI 0.70 to 0.88) and serious decline in kidney function (RR 0.59, 0.49 to 0.71). Significant adverse effects were observed for genital infections (RR 3.06, 95%CI 2.73 to 4.43), volume depletion events (RR1.24, 95%CI 1.07 to 1.43) and amputation (RR 1.44 95%CI 1.13 to 1.83). There was a high likelihood of differences in the associations of the individual compounds with cardiovascular death, hypoglycaemia and amputation (all I2> 80%) and a moderate likelihood of differences in the associations with non-fatal stroke, all-cause death, urinary tract infection and fracture (all I2> 30%). There are strong overall associations of SGLT2 inhibition with protection against major cardiovascular events, heart failure, serious decline in kidney function and all-cause death. SGLT2 inhibitors were also associated with infections, volume depletion effects and amputation. Some associations appear to differ between compounds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Master 12 9%
Other 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 46 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 53 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,344,552
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice
#417
of 3,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,261
of 344,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice
#13
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.