↓ Skip to main content

Bayesian estimation of the number of protonation sites for urinary metabolites from NMR spectroscopic data

Overview of attention for article published in Metabolomics, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Bayesian estimation of the number of protonation sites for urinary metabolites from NMR spectroscopic data
Published in
Metabolomics, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11306-018-1351-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lifeng Ye, Maria De Iorio, Timothy M. D. Ebbels

Abstract

To aid the development of better algorithms for [Formula: see text]H NMR data analysis, such as alignment or peak-fitting, it is important to characterise and model chemical shift changes caused by variation in pH. The number of protonation sites, a key parameter in the theoretical relationship between pH and chemical shift, is traditionally estimated from the molecular structure, which is often unknown in untargeted metabolomics applications. We aim to use observed NMR chemical shift titration data to estimate the number of protonation sites for a range of urinary metabolites. A pool of urine from healthy subjects was titrated in the range pH 2-12, standard [Formula: see text]H NMR spectra were acquired and positions of 51 peaks (corresponding to 32 identified metabolites) were recorded. A theoretical model of chemical shift was fit to the data using a Bayesian statistical framework, using model selection procedures in a Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm to estimate the number of protonation sites for each molecule. The estimated number of protonation sites was found to be correct for 41 out of 51 peaks. In some cases, the number of sites was incorrectly estimated, due to very close pKa values or a limited amount of data in the required pH range. Given appropriate data, it is possible to estimate the number of protonation sites for many metabolites typically observed in [Formula: see text]H NMR metabolomics without knowledge of the molecular structure. This approach may be a valuable resource for the development of future automated metabolite alignment, annotation and peak fitting algorithms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 30%
Student > Master 4 20%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Researcher 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 30%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Mathematics 1 5%
Other 5 25%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2018.
All research outputs
#6,212,391
of 23,344,526 outputs
Outputs from Metabolomics
#330
of 1,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,008
of 331,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metabolomics
#21
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,344,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.