| Title |
Clinical and Molecular Findings in Three Japanese Patients with Crystalline Retinopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, September 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10384-006-0350-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zi-Bing Jin, Shigeo Ito, Yoshihiro Saito, Yuji Inoue, Yasuo Yanagi, Nobuhisa Nao-i |
| Abstract |
To identify CYP4V2 mutations in three unrelated Japanese patients with Bietti crystalline corneoretinal dystrophy (BCD). |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 3 | 25% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
| Researcher | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 50% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,823,605
of 23,271,751 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
#29
of 497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,338
of 67,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,271,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 497 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them