↓ Skip to main content

Improved Conventional PCR Assay for Detecting Tetracapsuloides bryosalmonae DNA in Fish Tissues

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Aquatic Animal Health, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improved Conventional PCR Assay for Detecting Tetracapsuloides bryosalmonae DNA in Fish Tissues
Published in
Journal of Aquatic Animal Health, April 2018
DOI 10.1002/aah.10020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick R. Hutchins, Adam J. Sepulveda, Renee M. Martin, Lacey R. Hopper

Abstract

Conventional PCR is an established method to detect Tetracapsuloides bryosalmonae DNA in fish tissues and to confirm diagnosis of proliferative kidney disease (PKD) caused by T. bryosalmonae. However, the commonly used PKX5f-6r primers were designed with the intention of obtaining sequence information and are suboptimal for determining parasite DNA presence. A new PCR assay to detect T. bryosalmonae 18s rDNA, PKX18s1266f-1426r, is presented that demonstrates specificity, repeatability, and enhanced sensitivity over the PKX5f-6r assay. The limit of detection of the PKX18s1266f-1426r assay at 95% confidence was 100 template copies and the new primers detected parasite DNA more consistently at template concentrations below 100 copies than PKX5f-6r. The PKX18s1266f-1426r also achieved 100% detection at sample DNA concentrations one order of magnitude lower than PKX5f-6r. Out of 127 salmonid fish with unknown T. bryosalmonae infection status, PKX5f-6r detected 35 positive samples while the new assay detected 43. The discrepancy in T. bryosalmonae detection between the two primer sets may be attributed to several differences between the assays, including oligonucleotide melting temperatures, the use of a touchdown PCR thermal cycle, and amplicon length. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 45%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2018.
All research outputs
#13,895,132
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Aquatic Animal Health
#145
of 267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,492
of 325,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Aquatic Animal Health
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 267 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.