↓ Skip to main content

ZNT4 gene is not responsible for acrodermatitis enteropathica in Japanese families

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
ZNT4 gene is not responsible for acrodermatitis enteropathica in Japanese families
Published in
Human Genetics, January 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00439-001-0661-7
Authors

Aoi Nakano, Hajime Nakano, Katsumi Hanada, Kazuo Nomura, Jouni Uitto

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Professor 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2008.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#933
of 2,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,010
of 123,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.