↓ Skip to main content

The human polycystic kidney disease 2-like (PKDL) gene: exon/intron structure and evidence for a novel splicing mechanism

Overview of attention for article published in Mammalian Genome, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
The human polycystic kidney disease 2-like (PKDL) gene: exon/intron structure and evidence for a novel splicing mechanism
Published in
Mammalian Genome, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s003350010009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lei Guo, Minghua Chen, Nuria Basora, Jing Zhou

Abstract

Polycystin-L is a member of the expanding family of polycystins. Mutations in polycystin-1 or -2 cause human autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). The mouse ortholog of PKDL, Pkdl, is deleted in a mouse line with renal and retinal defects. We recently have shown that polycystin-L has calcium channel properties. In the current study, we determined the exon/intron organization of the PKDL gene and its alternative splicing. We show that PKDL has 16 exons. All splice acceptor/donor sites for these exons conform to the GT-AG rule. The positions of introns and the sizes of exons in the PKDL gene are very similar to those of PKD2, except for the last two 3' end exons. RT-PCR demonstrates the existence of at least three polycystin-L splice variants: PKDL(Delta5), PKDL(Delta456), and PKDL(Delta15) that are expressed in a tissue-specific manner. In addition, we have localized polymorphic marker D10S603 to intron 4 and exon 5 of PKDL. Elucidation of the gene structure, exact location, and alternative splicing patterns of PKDL will facilitate its evaluation as a candidate gene in cystic or other genetic disorders.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 32%
Professor 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 21%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Mammalian Genome
#318
of 1,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,698
of 221,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammalian Genome
#27
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.