| Title |
New evidence for rice cultivation from the Early Neolithic Hehuashan site
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12520-018-0602-1 |
| Authors |
Zhenwei Qiu, Leping Jiang, Changsui Wang, David V. Hill, Yan Wu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 42% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2018.
All research outputs
#2,161,870
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#140
of 798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,506
of 438,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.