↓ Skip to main content

Genomic organization of the extracellular coding region of the human FGFR4 and FLT4 genes: Evolution of the genes encoding receptor tyrosine kinases with immunoglobulin-like domains

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, July 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Genomic organization of the extracellular coding region of the human FGFR4 and FLT4 genes: Evolution of the genes encoding receptor tyrosine kinases with immunoglobulin-like domains
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, July 1997
DOI 10.1007/pl00006199
Pubmed ID
Authors

François Agnès, Marguerite-Marie Toux, Catherine André, Francis Galibert

Abstract

Receptor tyrosine kinases with five, seven, and three Ig-like domains in their extracellular region are grouped in subclasses IIIa, IIIb, and IIIc, respectively. Here, we describe the genomic organization of the extracellular coding region of the human FGFR4 (IIIc) and FLT4 (IIIb) genes and compare it to that of the human FGFR1(IIIc), KIT, and FMS (IIIa). The results show that while genes belonging to the same subclass have an identical exon/intron structure in their extracellular coding region-as they do in their intracellular coding region-genes of related subclasses only have a similar exon/intron structure. These results strongly support the hypothesis that the genes of the three subclasses evolved from a common ancestor by duplications involving entire genes, already in pieces. Hypotheses on the origin of introns and on the difference in the number of extracellular Ig-like domains in the three gene subclasses are discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 43%
Student > Bachelor 2 29%
Professor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#450
of 1,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,364
of 29,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.