You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dysfunction of NaV1.4, a skeletal muscle voltage-gated sodium channel, in sudden infant death syndrome: a case-control study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30021-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roope Männikkö, Leonie Wong, David J Tester, Michael G Thor, Richa Sud, Dimitri M Kullmann, Mary G Sweeney, Costin Leu, Sanjay M Sisodiya, David R FitzPatrick, Margaret J Evans, Iona J M Jeffrey, Jacob Tfelt-Hansen, Marta C Cohen, Peter J Fleming, Amie Jaye, Michael A Simpson, Michael J Ackerman, Michael G Hanna, Elijah R Behr, Emma Matthews |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 15% |
| United States | 6 | 10% |
| Spain | 4 | 7% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Namibia | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 61% |
| Scientists | 13 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 137 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 22% |
| Unknown | 35 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 43 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 278. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#130,116
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#1,731
of 43,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,092
of 347,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#37
of 378 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 378 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.