| Title |
Establishment of dermal sheath cell line from Cashmere goat and characterizing cytokeratin 13 as its novel biomarker
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biotechnology Techniques, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10529-018-2532-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bing Zhu, Zhili Guo, Muzi Jin, Yujuan Bai, Wenliang Yang, Lihua Hui |
| Abstract |
To establish a dermal sheath cell line, a dermal papilla cell line and a outer root sheath cell line from Cashmere goat and clarify the similarities and differences among them. We established a dermal sheath cell line, a dermal papilla cell line and a outer root sheath cell line from the pelage skin hair follicles of Cashmere goat. The growth rate of dermal sheath cells was intermediate between that of dermal papilla cells and outer root sheath cells. Immunofluorescence experiments and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis showed that at both the transcriptional and translational levels, the dermal sheath cells were alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA)+/cytokeratin 13+, while the dermal papilla cells were α-SMA+/cytokeratin 13-and the outer root sheath cells were α-SMA-/cytokeratin 13+. Patterns of cytokeratin 13 expression could distinguish the dermal sheath cells from the dermal papilla cells. These results suggest that cytokeratin 13 could serve as a novel biomarker for dermal sheath cells of Cashmere goat, and should prove useful for researchers investigating dermal stem cells or interaction of different types of cells during hair cycle. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology Techniques
#2,206
of 2,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,809
of 343,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology Techniques
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.