↓ Skip to main content

cDNA cloning of human DEC-205, a putative antigen-uptake receptor on dendritic cells

Overview of attention for article published in Immunogenetics, April 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
cDNA cloning of human DEC-205, a putative antigen-uptake receptor on dendritic cells
Published in
Immunogenetics, April 1998
DOI 10.1007/s002510050381
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masato Kato, Teresa K. Neil, Georgina J. Clark, Christine M. Morris, R. V. Sorg, D. N. J. Hart

Abstract

Dendritic cells (DC) are specialist antigen presenting cells which capture antigens in the periphery, migrate centrally, and present the processed antigens in the context of major histocompatibility complex and appropriate co-stimulatory molecules to T lymphocytes for the initiation of an immune response. DEC-205 has been identified as a putative antigen-uptake receptor, which is expressed abundantly on mouse DC. The recently cloned mouse DEC-205 cDNA predicts a molecular structure which has a marked similarity to the macrophage mannose receptor. Using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and cDNA library screening, we obtained the full coding region of human DEC-205 cDNA from the Hodgkin's disease-derived L428 cell line. The predicted protein structure is a type I transmembrane protein of 1722 amino acids consisting of a signal peptide, cysteine-rich domain, fibronectin type II domain, ten carbohydrate recognition-like domains, transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic tail. Human DEC-205 is 77% identical to the mouse protein with completely conserved cysteines. The DEC-205 gene (LY75) was mapped to chromosome band 2q24 by somatic cell hybrid panel analysis and fluorescent in situ hybridization. Northern blot analysis detected 7.8 and 9.5 kilobase DEC-205 transcripts in myeloid, B lymphoid, and Hodgkin's disease-derived cell lines. RT-PCR analysis indicated that immature blood DC contain a barely detectable amount of DEC-205 transcripts but these were markedly increased upon differentiation/activation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Researcher 4 17%
Other 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 30%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Immunogenetics
#350
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,369
of 32,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunogenetics
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.