↓ Skip to main content

Hämostyptika zur Behandlung der „junctional vascular injuries“

Overview of attention for article published in Die Unfallchirurgie, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Hämostyptika zur Behandlung der „junctional vascular injuries“
Published in
Die Unfallchirurgie, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00113-018-0483-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. C. Hinck, S. Wipper, E. S. Debus

Abstract

Uncontrolled post-traumatic bleeding is still the leading cause of death among trauma patients. In situations of mass casualty incidents (MASCAL) and military conflicts the treatment of uncontrolled critical bleeding is a challenge and associated with a worse outcome due to the austere environment; however, even under optimal treatment circumstances in situations of individual medicine the severity of vascular trauma is underestimated. As a consequence, this leads to a poorer prognosis for patients with (vascular) injuries. From this perspective it was reasonable to intensify the training of physicians, paramedics (Advanced Trauma Life Support © ) and first responders (Hartford consensus) for handling of critical bleeding in traumatized patients. Furthermore, the main emphasis of the revised S3 clinical guidelines on polytrauma/severely injured treatment from 2016 of the German Society for Trauma Surgery is on the preclinical treatment. Despite a renaissance and increasing use of tourniquets, the treatment of bleeding in the transition from the trunk to the extremities (junctional vascular injuries), which are inaccessible to placing a tourniquet, remains a problem. It was the military that in addition to the development of special tourniquets, intensified research programs and the implementation of hemostatic devices and dressings in this anatomical region. This article deals with junctional vascular injuries at the transition between the trunk and the extremities. In addition to the anatomical situation, this article gives the reader an overview of the currently available hemostyptics and their mode of action.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Master 4 16%
Unspecified 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Unspecified 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 11 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Die Unfallchirurgie
#439
of 819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,595
of 344,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Unfallchirurgie
#7
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 819 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.