| Title |
The active microbial community more accurately reflects the anaerobic digestion process: 16S rRNA (gene) sequencing as a predictive tool
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40168-018-0449-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jo De Vrieze, Ameet J. Pinto, William T. Sloan, Umer Zeeshan Ijaz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 22% |
| Belgium | 3 | 13% |
| Austria | 2 | 9% |
| India | 2 | 9% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 57% |
| Scientists | 10 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 262 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 23% |
| Researcher | 42 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 12% |
| Unknown | 55 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 35 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 12% |
| Engineering | 23 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 12% |
| Unknown | 87 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,807,768
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1,103
of 1,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,574
of 346,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#47
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.