↓ Skip to main content

Issues About Retinex Theory and Contrast Enhancement

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Computer Vision, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Issues About Retinex Theory and Contrast Enhancement
Published in
International Journal of Computer Vision, February 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11263-009-0221-5
Authors

Marcelo Bertalmío, Vicent Caselles, Edoardo Provenzi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Switzerland 1 1%
Indonesia 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Ukraine 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 58 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 24%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Master 9 13%
Other 6 9%
Professor 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 34 51%
Engineering 11 16%
Mathematics 6 9%
Psychology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,549,344
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Vision
#399
of 1,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,378
of 94,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Vision
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.