↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility of adapting the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery trainer box to endoscopic skills training tool

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Feasibility of adapting the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery trainer box to endoscopic skills training tool
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00464-018-6154-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oscar M. Crespin, Allan Okrainec, Andrea V. Kwong, Ilay Habaz, Maria Carolina Jimenez, Peter Szasz, Ethan Weiss, Cecilia G. Gonzalez, Jeffrey D. Mosko, Louis W. C. Liu, Lee L. Swanstrom, Silvana Perretta, Eran Shlomovitz

Abstract

The fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) training box is a validated tool, already accessible to surgical trainees to hone their laparoscopic skills. We aim to investigate the feasibility of adapting the FLS box for the practice and assessment of endoscopic skills. This would allow for a highly available, reusable, low-cost, mechanical trainer. The design and development process was based on a user-centered design, which is a combination of the design thinking method and cognitive task analysis. The process comprises four phases: empathy, cognitive, prototyping/adaptation, and end user testing. The underlying idea was to utilize as many of the existing components of FLS training to maintain simplicity and cost effectiveness while allowing for the practice of clinically relevant endoscopic skills. A sample size of 18 participants was calculated to be sufficient to detect performance differences between experts and trainees using a two tailed t test with alpha set at 0.05, standard deviation of 5.5, and a power of 80%. Adaptation to the FLS box included two fundamental attachments: a front panel with an insertion point for an endoscope and a shaft which provides additional support and limits movement of the scope. The panel also allows for mounting of retroflexion tasks. Six endoscopic tasks inspired by FLS were designed (two of which utilize existing FLS components). Pilot testing with 38 participants showed high user's satisfaction and demonstrated that the trainer was robust and reliable. Task performance times was able to discriminate between trainees and experts for all six tasks. A mechanical, reusable, low-cost adaptation of the FLS training box for endoscopic skills is feasible and has high user satisfaction. Preliminary testing shows that the simulator is able to discriminate between trainees and experts. Following further validation, this adaptation may act as a supplement to the FES program.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 26 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 16%
Engineering 5 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 6%
Psychology 4 6%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 29 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#6,272,195
of 25,306,238 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,029
of 6,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,431
of 335,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#18
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,306,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,808 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.