↓ Skip to main content

Weak and Strong Solutions of the 3D Navier–Stokes Equations and Their Relation to a Chessboard of Convergent Inverse Length Scales

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nonlinear Science, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Weak and Strong Solutions of the 3D Navier–Stokes Equations and Their Relation to a Chessboard of Convergent Inverse Length Scales
Published in
Journal of Nonlinear Science, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00332-018-9484-8
Authors

J. D. Gibbon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 33%
Psychology 1 17%
Mathematics 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2018.
All research outputs
#18,594,219
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nonlinear Science
#164
of 337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,061
of 327,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nonlinear Science
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 337 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.