↓ Skip to main content

Bigger, stronger, faster, fitter: the differences in physical qualities of school and academy rugby union players

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Sports Sciences, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
38 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bigger, stronger, faster, fitter: the differences in physical qualities of school and academy rugby union players
Published in
Journal of Sports Sciences, April 2018
DOI 10.1080/02640414.2018.1458589
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ben Jones, Dan Weaving, Jason Tee, Joshua Darrall-Jones, Jonathon Weakley, Padraic Phibbs, Dale Read, Gregory Roe, Sharief Hendricks, Kevin Till

Abstract

Limited research has compared the physical qualities of adolescent rugby union (RU) players across differing playing standards. This study therefore compared the physical qualities of academy and school Under-18 RU players. One-hundred and eighty-four (professional regional academy, n = 55 school, n = 129) male RU players underwent a physical testing battery to quantify height, body mass, strength (bench press and pull-up), speed (10, 20 and 40 m), 10 m momentum (calculated; 10 m velocity * body mass) and a proxy measure of aerobic fitness (Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1; IRTL1). The practical significance of differences between playing levels were assessed using magnitude-based inferences. Academy players were taller (very likely small), heavier (likely moderate) and stronger (bench press possibly large; pull-up plus body mass likely small) than school players. Academy players were faster than school players over 20 and 40 m (possibly and likely small), although differences in 10 m speed were not apparent (possibly trivial). Academy players displayed greater 10 m momentum (likely moderate) and greater IRTL1 performance (likely small) than school players. These findings suggest that body size, strength, running momentum, 40 m speed and aerobic fitness contribute to a higher playing standard in adolescent rugby union.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 153 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 23 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 45 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 81 53%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 45 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,488,690
of 24,493,651 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Sports Sciences
#615
of 3,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,985
of 333,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Sports Sciences
#15
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,493,651 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.