↓ Skip to main content

Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Anti-Bisexual Experiences Scale

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Anti-Bisexual Experiences Scale
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10508-018-1157-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Dyar, Brian A. Feinstein, Joanne Davila

Abstract

Experiencing anti-bisexual discrimination has been linked with numerous negative consequences, such as internalized stigma and symptoms of anxiety and depression. A commonly used measure of anti-bisexual discrimination in research is the Anti-Bisexual Experiences Scale (ABES). While this scale has been instrumental in advancing knowledge about discrimination against bisexual individuals, its length presents challenges to widespread use and it remains unknown if its psychometric properties are consistent across diverse genders and non-monosexual identities. To address these limitations, the current study developed and validated a brief version of the ABES. Using confirmatory factor analysis, we reduced the number of items by more than half, while retaining the full measure's associations with other stigma- and identity-related constructs as well as mental health. Invariance testing indicated that the Brief ABES functioned similarly across diverse genders (i.e., cisgender men, cisgender women, and gender minorities) and sexual identities (i.e., bisexual and other non-monosexual identities). These findings provide initial validation of the Brief ABES and demonstrate that it can be used with bisexual and other non-monosexual (e.g., pansexual, queer) individuals, including cisgender and gender minority individuals.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 20 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 38%
Social Sciences 8 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Philosophy 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 23 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2018.
All research outputs
#5,811,307
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#1,706
of 3,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,329
of 328,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#38
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.