↓ Skip to main content

Nonlinear Predictive Models for Multiple Mediation Analysis: With an Application to Explore Ethnic Disparities in Anxiety and Depression Among Cancer Survivors

Overview of attention for article published in Psychometrika, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Nonlinear Predictive Models for Multiple Mediation Analysis: With an Application to Explore Ethnic Disparities in Anxiety and Depression Among Cancer Survivors
Published in
Psychometrika, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11336-018-9612-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qingzhao Yu, Kaelen L. Medeiros, Xiaocheng Wu, Roxanne E. Jensen

Abstract

Mediation analysis allows the examination of effects of a third variable (mediator/confounder) in the causal pathway between an exposure and an outcome. The general multiple mediation analysis method (MMA), proposed by Yu et al., improves traditional methods (e.g., estimation of natural and controlled direct effects) to enable consideration of multiple mediators/confounders simultaneously and the use of linear and nonlinear predictive models for estimating mediation/confounding effects. Previous studies find that compared with non-Hispanic cancer survivors, Hispanic survivors are more likely to endure anxiety and depression after cancer diagnoses. In this paper, we applied MMA on MY-Health study to identify mediators/confounders and quantify the indirect effect of each identified mediator/confounder in explaining ethnic disparities in anxiety and depression among cancer survivors who enrolled in the study. We considered a number of socio-demographic variables, tumor characteristics, and treatment factors as potential mediators/confounders and found that most of the ethnic differences in anxiety or depression between Hispanic and non-Hispanic white cancer survivors were explained by younger diagnosis age, lower education level, lower proportions of employment, less likely of being born in the USA, less insurance, and less social support among Hispanic patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 2 4%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 24 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 25 44%