↓ Skip to main content

The uses of set theory

Overview of attention for article published in The Mathematical Intelligencer, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
The uses of set theory
Published in
The Mathematical Intelligencer, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/bf03024144
Authors

Judith Roitman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 33%
Computer Science 1 33%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from The Mathematical Intelligencer
#268
of 764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,663
of 183,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Mathematical Intelligencer
#54
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.