↓ Skip to main content

Radula und Fangarme beiMichelinoceras sp. aus dem Silur von Bolivien

Overview of attention for article published in PalZ, December 1984
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Radula und Fangarme beiMichelinoceras sp. aus dem Silur von Bolivien
Published in
PalZ, December 1984
DOI 10.1007/bf02986061
Authors

Johannes Mehl

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2020.
All research outputs
#6,860,107
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from PalZ
#150
of 649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,826
of 40,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PalZ
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them