↓ Skip to main content

Allelic repertoire of the human MICB gene

Overview of attention for article published in Immunogenetics, September 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Allelic repertoire of the human MICB gene
Published in
Immunogenetics, September 1997
DOI 10.1007/s002510050299
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phillipe Pellet, Marc Renaud, Nassima Fodil, Laurent Laloux, Hidetoshi Inoko, Georges Hauptmann, Patrice Debré, Seiamak Bahram, I. Theodorou

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Other 2 20%
Unspecified 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Neuroscience 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2007.
All research outputs
#8,515,480
of 25,388,229 outputs
Outputs from Immunogenetics
#351
of 1,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,399
of 29,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunogenetics
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.