↓ Skip to main content

Organ support therapy in the intensive care unit and return to work: a nationwide, register-based cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
80 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Organ support therapy in the intensive care unit and return to work: a nationwide, register-based cohort study
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00134-018-5157-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Signe Riddersholm, Steffen Christensen, Kristian Kragholm, Christian F. Christiansen, Bodil Steen Rasmussen

Abstract

The association between severity of illness and ability to return to work is unclear. Therefore, we investigated return to work and associations with measures of illness severity in ICU survivors. We conducted this cohort study using Danish registry data for the period 2005-2014 on ICU patients who were discharged alive from hospital, had an ICU length of stay (LOS) of at least 72 h, were not treated with dialysis before hospital admission and were working prior to admission. We assessed (1) the cumulative incidence (chance) of return to work (2005-2017) and receipt of social benefits after discharge from a hospital stay with ICU admission and (2) the association between organ support therapies (renal replacement therapy, cardiovascular support and mechanical ventilation), and during 2011-2014 SAPS II and ICU LOS, and return to work, using multivariable Cox regression. Among 5762 ICU survivors, 68% returned to work within 2 years after hospital discharge. Disability and sickness benefits constituted 89% of social benefits among patients not returning to work and 59% among patients withdrawing from work following an initial return to work. Mechanical ventilation (HR 0.70, 95% CI [0.65-0.77]), but not RRT (HR 0.85, 95% CI [0.71-1.02]), cardiovascular support (HR 0.93, 95% CI [0.82-1.07]) and increasing SAPS II, was associated with decreased chance of return to work. Increasing ICU LOS was also associated with a decreased chance of return to work. The majority of a nationwide cohort of ICU survivors returned to work. Sick leave and receipt of disability pension were common following ICU admission. Mechanical ventilation and longer ICU LOS were associated with reduced chances of return to work.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 16 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 15%
Unspecified 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 19 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2018.
All research outputs
#883,719
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#847
of 5,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,710
of 335,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#32
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.