↓ Skip to main content

Did Pearson reject the Neyman-Pearson philosophy of statistics?

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, February 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Did Pearson reject the Neyman-Pearson philosophy of statistics?
Published in
Synthese, February 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00485352
Authors

Deborah G. Mayo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Sweden 1 6%
South Africa 1 6%
Unknown 13 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 25%
Researcher 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 5 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 38%
Philosophy 4 25%
Social Sciences 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Mathematics 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2013.
All research outputs
#7,729,950
of 23,500,709 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#853
of 2,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,730
of 62,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,500,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.