↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Natural Language Processing in languages other than English: opportunities and challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Semantics, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
283 Mendeley
Title
Clinical Natural Language Processing in languages other than English: opportunities and challenges
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Semantics, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13326-018-0179-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aurélie Névéol, Hercules Dalianis, Sumithra Velupillai, Guergana Savova, Pierre Zweigenbaum

Abstract

Natural language processing applied to clinical text or aimed at a clinical outcome has been thriving in recent years. This paper offers the first broad overview of clinical Natural Language Processing (NLP) for languages other than English. Recent studies are summarized to offer insights and outline opportunities in this area. We envision three groups of intended readers: (1) NLP researchers leveraging experience gained in other languages, (2) NLP researchers faced with establishing clinical text processing in a language other than English, and (3) clinical informatics researchers and practitioners looking for resources in their languages in order to apply NLP techniques and tools to clinical practice and/or investigation. We review work in clinical NLP in languages other than English. We classify these studies into three groups: (i) studies describing the development of new NLP systems or components de novo, (ii) studies describing the adaptation of NLP architectures developed for English to another language, and (iii) studies focusing on a particular clinical application. We show the advantages and drawbacks of each method, and highlight the appropriate application context. Finally, we identify major challenges and opportunities that will affect the impact of NLP on clinical practice and public health studies in a context that encompasses English as well as other languages.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 283 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 17%
Researcher 35 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 12%
Student > Bachelor 25 9%
Other 16 6%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 85 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 69 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 10%
Engineering 16 6%
Linguistics 10 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 48 17%
Unknown 106 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,231,666
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Semantics
#103
of 361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,877
of 330,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Semantics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 361 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them