↓ Skip to main content

Movement of anterior teeth using clear aligners: a three-dimensional, retrospective evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Orthodontics, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
Title
Movement of anterior teeth using clear aligners: a three-dimensional, retrospective evaluation
Published in
Progress in Orthodontics, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40510-018-0207-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michele Tepedino, Valeria Paoloni, Paola Cozza, Claudio Chimenti

Abstract

Clear aligner treatment offers several advantages, but the available literature shows that some kind of tooth movements are unpredictable. In addition, the majority of the studies are focused on one clear aligner system, while different characteristics of various systems can provide different treatment outcomes. The aim of the present retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the predictability of Nuvola® aligner system in achieving torque movements of anterior teeth. Thirty-nine adult patients, who were consecutively treated with clear aligners, were retrospectively selected, and digital models pre-treatment (T0), post-treatment (T1) and the digital setup models (TS) were collected. Only the first phase of treatment made of 12 aligners was considered for the present study. Torque of anterior teeth was measured as labiolingual inclination on digital models at T0, T1, and TS using VAM software. Any difference between the predicted and achieved torque movements was evaluated using Wilcoxon signed-rank test or paired sample t test. First-type error was set as p < 0.008. No statistically significant difference was found for all the anterior teeth between predicted and achieved torque movements. The studied clear aligner system was able to produce clinical outcomes comparable to the planning of the digital setup relative to torque movements of the anterior teeth.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 171 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Postgraduate 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Researcher 7 4%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 75 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Engineering 2 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 79 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2018.
All research outputs
#19,924,915
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Orthodontics
#158
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,499
of 342,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Orthodontics
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.