| Title |
Cultural innovation and transmission of tool use in wild chimpanzees: evidence from field experiments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Cognition, July 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10071-003-0183-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dora Biro, Noriko Inoue-Nakamura, Rikako Tonooka, Gen Yamakoshi, Claudia Sousa, Tetsuro Matsuzawa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Canada | 3 | 14% |
| Brazil | 2 | 10% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 52% |
| Members of the public | 9 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 475 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 448 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 92 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 88 | 19% |
| Researcher | 83 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 83 | 17% |
| Professor | 19 | 4% |
| Other | 63 | 13% |
| Unknown | 47 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 192 | 40% |
| Psychology | 88 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 40 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 25 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 8% |
| Unknown | 68 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2023.
All research outputs
#856,439
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#210
of 1,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#755
of 53,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them