Title |
The role of BETA2/NeuroD1 in the development of the nervous system
|
---|---|
Published in |
Molecular Neurobiology, January 2004
|
DOI | 10.1385/mn:30:1:035 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jang-Hyeon Cho, Ming-Jer Tsai |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 52 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 25% |
Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
Researcher | 7 | 13% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 34% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 26% |
Neuroscience | 6 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2007.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurobiology
#1,608
of 3,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,568
of 143,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurobiology
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.