↓ Skip to main content

Improving carrier-phase ambiguity resolution in global GPS network solutions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geodesy, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Improving carrier-phase ambiguity resolution in global GPS network solutions
Published in
Journal of Geodesy, April 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00190-005-0447-0
Authors

M. Ge, G. Gendt, G. Dick, F. P. Zhang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 7%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 52 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 31%
Researcher 8 14%
Lecturer 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 20 34%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 33%
Physics and Astronomy 6 10%
Mathematics 2 3%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,549,344
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geodesy
#84
of 282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,472
of 58,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geodesy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them