| Title |
What Information Do Clinicians Use in Recommending Oral versus Nonoral Feeding in Oropharyngeal Dysphagic Patients?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dysphagia, August 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00455-008-9152-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeri A. Logemann, Alfred Rademaker, Barbara Roa Pauloski, Jodi Antinoja, Mary Bacon, Michelle Bernstein, Joy Gaziano, Barbara Grande, Lisa Kelchner, Amy Kelly, Bernice Klaben, Donna Lundy, Lisa Newman, Daphne Santa, Linda Stachowiak, Carrie Stangl-McBreen, Cory Atkinson, Heidi Bassani, Melissa Czapla, Julie Farquharson, Kristin Larsen, Vicki Lewis, Heather Logan, Teri Nitschke, Sharon Veis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 19% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 15% |
| Psychology | 4 | 8% |
| Linguistics | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,862,539
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#597
of 1,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,981
of 83,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.