| Title |
The Caregiver Burden Inventory in evaluating the burden of caregivers of elderly demented patients: results from a multicenter study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf03337720 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martina Marvardi, Paola Mattioli, Liana Spazzafumo, Roberta Mastriforti, Patrizia Rinaldi, Maria Cristina Polidori, Antonio Cherubini, Roberto Quartesan, Luisa Bartorelli, Salvatore Bonaiuto, Domenico Cucinotta, Angelo Di Iorio, Maurizio Gallucci, Marcello Giordano, Marina Martorelli, Giorgio Masaraki, Antonio Nieddu, Carla Pettenati, Paolo Putzu, Vincenzo Solfrizzi, Aldo Edoardo Tammaro, Pia Francesca Tomassini, Carlo Vergani, Umberto Senin, Patrizia Mecocci, Study Group on Brain Aging of the Italian Society of Gerontology and Geriatrics |
| Abstract |
The burden perceived by caregivers of patients with dementia is a fundamental prognostic aspect in the history of the disease. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the internal consistency of the Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI), a scale used to quantify burdens in different aspects of a caregiver's life, and the influence of patients' and caregivers' characteristics on its different dimensions. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 24% |
| Psychology | 22 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,976,997
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#671
of 1,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,695
of 309,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#23
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.