↓ Skip to main content

Progressive aphasia presenting with deep dyslexia and dysgraphia

Overview of attention for article published in Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System & Behavior, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Progressive aphasia presenting with deep dyslexia and dysgraphia
Published in
Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System & Behavior, March 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.02.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie S. Snowden, Jacqueline Kindell, Jennifer C. Thompson, Anna M.T. Richardson, David Neary

Abstract

Primary progressive aphasia is clinically heterogeneous. We report a patient, alias Don, with a novel form of progressive aphasia, characterised by deep dyslexia and dysgraphia and dissociated access to phonological and orthographic word forms. The hallmarks of deep dyslexia and dysgraphia were present early in the course and persisted over time. Writing was initially poorer than reading, but this reversed over time. There was a lack of concordance between reading and writing errors. Don benefited from a semantic mediation strategy to learn letter sounds, involving associating letters with a country name (e.g., A=Afghanistan). Remarkably, he continued to be able to generate those phonologically complex country names when no longer able to name or sound letters. Don's performance is compatible with a traditional dual-route account of deep dyslexia and dysgraphia. The findings have potential practical implications for speech and language therapy in progressive aphasia. Moreover, they illustrate both the remarkable specificity yet clinical diversity in presentation of progressive aphasia.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Unknown 67 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Researcher 4 6%
Professor 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 17%
Linguistics 7 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Neuroscience 6 9%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 15 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System & Behavior
#1,552
of 3,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,652
of 168,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System & Behavior
#12
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.