| Title |
Global arrays: A nonuniform memory access programming model for high-performance computers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Supercomputing, June 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00130708 |
| Authors |
Jaroslaw Nieplocha, Robert J. Harrison, Richard J. Littlefield |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 2 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 37% |
| Researcher | 12 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 5 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 33 | 58% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 12% |
| Engineering | 5 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 4 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Supercomputing
#123
of 600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,401
of 26,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Supercomputing
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 600 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them