↓ Skip to main content

Shared Memory Programming in Metacomputing Environments: The Global Array Approach

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Supercomputing, October 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Shared Memory Programming in Metacomputing Environments: The Global Array Approach
Published in
The Journal of Supercomputing, October 1997
DOI 10.1023/a:1007955822788
Authors

Jarek Nieplocha, Robert Harrison

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Lecturer 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 2 40%
Computer Science 1 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 20%
Chemistry 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Supercomputing
#123
of 600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,366
of 28,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Supercomputing
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 600 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.