↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of the IL17 receptor family in chordates: a new subfamily IL17REL

Overview of attention for article published in Immunogenetics, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Evolution of the IL17 receptor family in chordates: a new subfamily IL17REL
Published in
Immunogenetics, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00251-011-0554-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Baojun Wu, Meng Jin, Yi Zhang, Tiandi Wei, Zengliang Bai

Abstract

The human interleukin 17 receptor (IL17R) family plays a critical role in inflammatory responses and contributes to the pathology of many autoimmune diseases. So far, five members, IL17RA to IL17RE, have been identified. Recently, some IL17R genes have been identified in non-mammalian species, such as zebrafish IL17RD; however, there are no reports on the evolutionary history of this complex gene family through comparative phylogenetic approaches. Here, we concentrated on the IL17R evolution in chordates. There are two IL17Rs in the genome of the basal chordate amphioxus: IL17RA and IL17RD. After two rounds of whole genome duplications, these two IL17R genes expanded into five early vertebrate IL17R genes, IL17RA to IL17RE. IL17RA and IL17RD are found in most vertebrates, whereas the other three, IL17RB, ILR17RC, and IL17RE, underwent some loss in vertebrates during evolution. Our sequence and structure analyses reveal functional similarities and distinctions between the different IL17Rs. Based on similarity searches for IL17R-like proteins within chordate sequences, a group of IL17RE-like (IL17REL) proteins were identified from mammalians to lower vertebrates. In silico and expression analyses on the novel IL17RELs showed that this group of receptors is highly conserved across species, indicating that IL17REL may represent a unique subfamily of IL17Rs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 33%
Researcher 9 30%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 10%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2011.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Immunogenetics
#323
of 1,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,625
of 116,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunogenetics
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,202 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.