↓ Skip to main content

Tumor initiating activity of NO donor in two-stage mouse skin carcinogenesis and its role of cGMP

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pharmacology, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Tumor initiating activity of NO donor in two-stage mouse skin carcinogenesis and its role of cGMP
Published in
BMC Pharmacology, June 2005
DOI 10.1186/1471-2210-5-s1-p54
Authors

Harukuni Tokuda, Fumio Enjo, Ayako Kumagai, Takao Konoshima, Midori Takasaki, Junko Takayasu, Hoyoku Nishino

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2008.
All research outputs
#7,549,344
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pharmacology
#26
of 63 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,445
of 46,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pharmacology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them