| Title |
Characterization of human carbonic anhydrase III from skeletal muscle
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biochemical Genetics, October 1979
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00504307 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicholas Carter, Stephen Jeffery, Alan Shiels, Yvonne Edwards, Terry Tipler, David A. Hopkinson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2007.
All research outputs
#8,515,480
of 25,388,229 outputs
Outputs from Biochemical Genetics
#76
of 582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,505
of 6,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemical Genetics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 582 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them