| Title |
A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, November 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s003300050586 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
P. Mozzo, C. Procacci, A. Tacconi, P. Tinazzi Martini, I. A. Bergamo Andreis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 644 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 8 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Egypt | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 625 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 128 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 78 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 67 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 55 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 6% |
| Other | 127 | 20% |
| Unknown | 152 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 367 | 57% |
| Engineering | 29 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 12 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 6% |
| Unknown | 171 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,848,050
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#131
of 5,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#968
of 42,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,098 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them