↓ Skip to main content

Learning to Attend: Modeling the Shaping of Selectivity in Infero-temporal Cortex in a Categorization Task

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Cybernetics, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Learning to Attend: Modeling the Shaping of Selectivity in Infero-temporal Cortex in a Categorization Task
Published in
Biological Cybernetics, March 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00422-006-0054-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miruna Szabo, Martin Stetter, Gustavo Deco, Stefano Fusi, Paolo Del Giudice, Maurizio Mattia

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 4%
United Kingdom 2 4%
Switzerland 1 2%
Uruguay 1 2%
France 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 44 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 42%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 23%
Professor 7 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Student > Master 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 25%
Psychology 12 23%
Neuroscience 10 19%
Engineering 4 8%
Physics and Astronomy 3 6%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 6 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2008.
All research outputs
#7,549,344
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#186
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,603
of 67,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.