↓ Skip to main content

QSTR with extended topochemical atom (ETA) indices. VI. Acute toxicity of benzene derivatives to tadpoles (Rana japonica)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Modeling, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
QSTR with extended topochemical atom (ETA) indices. VI. Acute toxicity of benzene derivatives to tadpoles (Rana japonica)
Published in
Journal of Molecular Modeling, October 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00894-005-0033-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kunal Roy, Gopinath Ghosh

Abstract

structure-toxicity relationship (QSTR) studies have proved to be a valuable approach in research on the toxicity of organic chemicals for ranking chemical substances with respect to their potential hazardous effects on living systems. With this background, we have modeled here the acute lethal toxicity of 51 benzene derivatives with recently introduced extended topochemical atom (ETA) indices [Roy and Ghosh, Internet Electron J Mol Des 2:599-620 (2003)]. We also compared the ETA relations with non-ETA models derived from different topological indices (Wiener W, Balaban J, flexibility index, Hosoya Z, Zagreb, molecular connectivity indices, E-state indices and kappa shape indices) and physicochemical parameters (AlogP98, MolRef,H_bond_donor and H_bond_acceptor). Genetic function approximation (GFA) and factor analysis (FA) were used as the data-preprocessing steps for the development of final multiple linear regression (MLR) equations. Principal-component regression analysis (PCRA) was also used to extract the total information from the ETA/non-ETA/combined matrices. All the models developed were cross-validated using leave-one-out (LOO) and leave-many-out techniques. The summary of the statistics of the best models is as follows: (1) FA-MLR: ETA model- Q 2 (LOO)=0.852, R 2=0.894; non-ETA model- Q 2=0.782, R 2=0.835; ETA + non-ETA model-Q 2 =0.815, R 2=0.859. (2) GFA-MLR: ETA model-Q 2 =0.847, R 2=0.915; non-ETA model-Q 2 =0.863, R 2=0.898; ETA + non-ETA model-Q 2 =0.859, R 2=0.893. 3. PCRA: ETA model-Q 2 =0.864, R 2=0.901; non-ETA model- Q 2=0.866, R 2=0.922; ETA + non-ETA model-Q 2=0.846, R 2=0.890. The statistical quality of the ETA models is comparable to that of non-ETA models. Again, use of non-ETA descriptors in addition to ETA descriptors does not increase the statistical acceptance of the relations significantly. The predictive potential of these models was better than that of the previously reported models using physicochemical parameters [Huang et al., Chemosphere 53:963-970 (2003)]. The relations from ETA descriptors suggest a parabolic dependence of the toxicity on molecular size. Furthermore, the toxicity increases with functionality contribution of chloro substituent and decreases with those of methoxy, hydroxy, carboxy and amino groups. This study suggests that ETA parameters are sufficiently rich in chemical information to encode the structural features that contribute significantly to the acute toxicity of benzene derivatives to Rana japonica.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Master 4 22%
Professor 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 17%
Computer Science 3 17%
Environmental Science 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2009.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Modeling
#178
of 813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,830
of 60,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Modeling
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 813 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.