↓ Skip to main content

Synthesis of L-phenylalanine analogs byRhodotorula glutinis. Bioconversion of cinnamic acids derivatives

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology Techniques, August 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Synthesis of L-phenylalanine analogs byRhodotorula glutinis. Bioconversion of cinnamic acids derivatives
Published in
Biotechnology Techniques, August 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf01021641
Authors

G. Renard, J -C. Guilleux, C. Bore, V. Malta-Valette, D. A. Lerner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2014.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology Techniques
#827
of 2,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,367
of 17,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology Techniques
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.