↓ Skip to main content

A molecular approach to the identification of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitopes within equine herpesvirus 1

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Virology, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A molecular approach to the identification of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitopes within equine herpesvirus 1
Published in
Journal of General Virology, September 2006
DOI 10.1099/vir.0.82070-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia H Kydd, N J Davis-Poynter, J Birch, D Hannant, J Minke, J-C Audonnet, D F Antczak, Shirley A Ellis

Abstract

Equine herpesvirus 1 (EHV-1) causes respiratory and neurological disease and abortion in horses. Animals with high frequencies of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) show reduced severity of respiratory disease and frequency of abortion, probably by CTL-mediated control of cell-associated viraemia. This study aimed to identify CTL epitopes restricted by selected major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I alleles expressed in the equine leukocyte antigen (ELA) A3 haplotype. Effector CTL were induced from EHV-1-primed ponies and thoroughbreds with characterized MHC class I haplotypes and screened against P815 target cells transfected with selected EHV-1 genes and MHC class I genes. Targets that expressed EHV-1 gene 64 and the MHC B2 gene were lysed by effector CTL in a genetically restricted manner. There was no T-cell recognition of targets expressing either the MHC B2 gene and EHV-1 genes 2, 12, 14, 16, 35, 63 or 69, or the MHC C1 gene and EHV-1 genes 12, 14, 16 or 64. A vaccinia virus vector encoding gene 64 (NYVAC-64) was also investigated. Using lymphocytes from ELA-A3 horses, the recombinant NYVAC-64 virus induced effector CTL that lysed EHV-1-infected target cells; the recombinant virus also supplied a functional peptide that was expressed by target cells and recognized in an MHC-restricted fashion by CTL induced with EHV-1. This construct may therefore be used to determine the antigenicity of EHV-1 gene 64 for other MHC haplotypes. These techniques are broadly applicable to the identification of additional CTL target proteins and their presenting MHC alleles, not only for EHV-1, but for other equine viruses.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2010.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Virology
#2,351
of 6,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,162
of 66,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Virology
#29
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.