You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Formation mechanism of TiO2 nanotubes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Physics Letters, January 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1063/1.1537518 |
| Authors |
B. D. Yao, Y. F. Chan, X. Y. Zhang, W. F. Zhang, Z. Y. Yang, N. Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 157 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Researcher | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 17% |
| Unknown | 26 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 49 | 30% |
| Chemistry | 42 | 26% |
| Engineering | 16 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 12 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 26 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2019.
All research outputs
#3,799,086
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Applied Physics Letters
#1,809
of 34,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,558
of 136,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Physics Letters
#9
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,579 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.