| Title |
Culturing precision-cut human prostate slices as an in vitro model of prostate pathobiology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Biology and Toxicology, January 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1015567805460 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A.R. Parrish, K. Sallam, D.W. Nyman, J. Orozco, A.E. Cress, B.L. Dalkin, R.B. Nagle, A.J. Gandolfi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 24% |
| Professor | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 14% |
| Engineering | 3 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2010.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cell Biology and Toxicology
#125
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,445
of 130,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Biology and Toxicology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.