| Title |
Distribution of the α2-macroglobulin receptor/low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein in human tissues
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell and Tissue Research, September 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00353892 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Søren K. Moestrup, Jørgen Gliemann, Gorm Pallesen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2014.
All research outputs
#5,700,702
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Research
#240
of 2,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,254
of 19,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Research
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them