↓ Skip to main content

Hispidulin Enhances the Anti-Tumor Effects of Temozolomide in Glioblastoma by Activating AMPK

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Hispidulin Enhances the Anti-Tumor Effects of Temozolomide in Glioblastoma by Activating AMPK
Published in
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12013-014-0252-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

YanGang Wang, WeiPing Liu, XiaoSheng He, Zhou Fei

Abstract

Glioblastoma is an aggressive malignancy, which is notorious for its poor prognosis. Although Temozolomide (TMZ) has been showed to be an effective chemotherapeutic agent for glioblastoma treatment, the response rate is far from satisfactory. As a natural compound with anti-cancer activity against a variety of cancers, Hispidulin is a good candidate drug for combination therapy. This study is designed to determine whether Hispidulin could potentiate the anti-tumor activity of TMZ in glioblastoma. Cell proliferation and apoptosis were determined by MTT assay and Hoechst staining, respectively. Expression of proteins relevant to apoptosis and proliferation was detected by Western blotting. Our in vitro assays showed that Hispidulin enhanced the anti-tumor activity of TMZ in glioblastoma by both inhibiting cell proliferation and inducing cell apoptosis. The anti-tumor activity of Hispidulin and the enhanced TMZ anti-tumor activity by Hispidulin induced the activation of AMPK signaling pathway. Our results showed that Hispidulin, by activating AMPK, exhibited anti-tumor activity and potentiated the anti-tumor activity of TMZ in glioblastoma. Although further preclinical and clinical studies are needed, this study provides insight for using Hispidulin as a chemosensitizing agent in clinic settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 5%
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 18 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Chemistry 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2015.
All research outputs
#20,258,759
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics
#562
of 910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,475
of 255,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics
#39
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 910 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.