You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Facial motion cloning with radial basis functions in MPEG-4 FBA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Graphical Models, March 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.gmod.2006.09.006 |
| Authors |
Marco Fratarcangeli, Marco Schaerf, Robert Forchheimer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 20% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 27% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 10 | 67% |
| Engineering | 2 | 13% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,899,179
of 25,613,746 outputs
Outputs from Graphical Models
#2
of 120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,286
of 90,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Graphical Models
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,613,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them