Title |
Use of viral replicons for the expression of genes in plants
|
---|---|
Published in |
Molecular Biotechnology, June 1996
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf02900359 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Claudine Porta, George P. Lomonossoff |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 26 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 22% |
Researcher | 6 | 22% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
Professor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 59% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 15% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 3 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,410,157
of 23,524,722 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Biotechnology
#50
of 999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,722
of 28,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Biotechnology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,524,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 999 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them