↓ Skip to main content

Detection of surface bound complement at increasing serum anticoagulant concentrations

Overview of attention for article published in Colloids & Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detection of surface bound complement at increasing serum anticoagulant concentrations
Published in
Colloids & Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, October 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.10.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Arvidsson, A. Askendal, T.L. Lindahl, P. Tengvall

Abstract

Surface mediated immune complement activation can be detected by a variety of antibody utilizing methods such as ELISA, fluorescence- or radiolabelling techniques, QCM, and ellipsometry. In the present work we investigated how the common anticoagulants heparin, dalteparin, fondaparinux and sodium citrate affected the binding of anti-complement factor 3c (anti-C3c) on a model complement activator surface, immobilised IgG, after incubation in human blood serum. The results show, as expected, that different anticoagulants affect the antibody binding differently. Increasing amounts of heparin, dalteparin and sodium citrate in normal serum resulted in a decreasing anti-C3c binding. The antibody deposition was not sensitive for the fondaparinux concentration. Surprisingly high concentrations of anti-coagulantia were needed to completely eradicate the antibody binding. Experiments in EGTA-serum showed that anticoagulants interfered directly with both the classical and alternative pathways. Control C3a-des arg ELISA measurements show that the lowered antibody surface binding was not a result of complement depletion in serum. Kallikrein generation by hydrophilic glass surfaces was not affected by high anticoagulant concentrations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Chemistry 2 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Colloids & Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
#680
of 3,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,553
of 84,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Colloids & Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,088 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.